Multitasking
In the article, “The Myth of
Multitasking”, author Christine Rosen details multitasking as “shorthand for
the human attempt to do simultaneously as many things as possible, as quickly
as possible, preferably marshalling the power of as many technologies as
possible,” (105).
Before this working definition was
presented, I had never thought of “multitasking” as a choice or a conscious
action (least of all an attempt); to me, it was what capable people do, it was how their very “capability”
was manifested. Right now,
I am enrolled in three graduate classes. I thought, “Sure, I can do all these
at the same time,” silently understanding “because I am capable enough to
multitask”. This understanding, meant to convey confidence, was strongly
flavored with hubris. While I am successful enough in each class, it goes
without saying that, if I had afforded myself the opportunity to focus on one
task at a time, the quality of my work would be vastly approved.
Culturally, when asked about multitasking,
it is generally accepted (by accepted, I mean proclaimed by the women and
admitted by the men) that it is ladies, not the fellas, who excel in this
practice. Of course, I am totally impartial... In this humorous clip, a group of men ponder the meaning of
“multitasking” and debate the necessity of their involvement in the practice:
This leads to my question:
Why is it that women are almost unanimously regarded as the superior mulitaskers?
"Multitasking: vice or virtue" could definitely be a great essay to write, particularly when it comes to the implications of multitasking on learning. What does overenrolling in graduate courses do for your long-term learning? These are often not questions we ask ourselves when making the daily decisions to multitask.
ReplyDelete